Me and my sister are in a debate, do you think the 2003 version staring eric bana or the 2008 version staring edward norton was a better movie?Let last movie one was far better than the 2003 movie. It could have been good, but the director made it an epic fail.The TV versionnever wacthed one don`t know what a hulk is. sorry.2008 defo, there is more effects i think, n the 2nd movie made me want to watch the first one believe it or not, :p, im slow i know watchin the 2nd one first ha, but brill film tho! but id say the 2nd one hope it helps the debate :) The second one was far better...The second one. It showed more character, more action, just overall a better adaptation of the hulk. The only thing better about the first one to me was the cgi.The second one was much better, the first one was wildly inconsistent. #If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |
|
10 March 2010 |
cameltoepants.com |
edit